We must find ways to deal with countries like Zimbabwe–Until a few years ago Zimbabwe was a success story. It had a certain stability and economic prosperity. It had problems, but it also had a future. In the last couple of years and certainly in the past year Zimbabwe had degenerated into a chaotic state with the economy is totally dysfunctional, unemployment the norm, food shortages and hunger an everyday occurrence, a health care system that is non-existent and now the threat of a cholera epidemic. It’s a man-made crisis, mainly the consequence of what appears to be the mental imbalance of its president Robert Mugabe. The situation is so dire that even Bishop Desmond Tutu last week suggested that if Mr. Mugabe does not step down, he should be removed “militarily”.
There has to be a better way than to allow countries to deteriorate into the level of suffering now being witness in Zimbabwe. I have no answer only the seed of an idea. The diplomatic apparatus of stable countries needs to include a plan or two for dealing with such cases. The United Nations must be empowered to create a special force. A protocol must be developed as to when this force is to be deployed. The point is that we cannot sit there lamenting the situation as we do with Congo, with Darfur, with Somalia, can no longer satisfy ourselves that the voices of celebrities sharing ugly facts is enough to act. It’s all too reminiscent of the fate of Jews in Nazi Germany. We’ve had enough genocides and crises since to accept that we must find a way to deal with governments that hurt their own citizens. If not we become accomplices in the horror and fail in the responsibility each human being has towards his and her human siblings.

By voting for Barak Obama, it is the American electorate which made history–As we talk about the election, we can’t avoid mentioning its historical significance. the idea is that as the first African American to be elected, Barak Obama made history. It may be that another perspective is far more accurate, the people who voted for him made history. Without each and every single vote the victory would not have been possible. It is an important distinction because it is We the People, though we were made up of a different group in those days, who discriminated and insisted on Jim Crow laws. It is We The People who perpetuated segregation and all its indignities. It was therefore up to We The People to undo it, and that is what happened last November 4th. For the karma believers it was a karmic debt created by The People and therefore one We had to undo. For the more traditionally minded, it was an example based on the biblical notion that the sins of the father are visited upon the sons, a principle therefore enjoining us to take responsibility to redress the wrong of our forefathers. In that context it may have taken a few generations, but it was nonetheless accomplished. Either way it speaks for the power of the collective, for the relation of the individual to the whole, and for the importance each voice does hold.

Seeing how the Chinese government can interfere with religious freedom helps us better appreciate our own–Thanksgiving makes one think of the Pilgrims. One of the reasons they came to the New World was freedom of religion, not only the freedom to worship whatever religion they were called to, but to practice that religion without government interference. We all know that the Chinese government does not make religious freedom easy, and yet when I read recently about rules issued about the practice of Islam in a northern province where 46% of the people are Muslims, I was reminded of what we tend to take for granted in the United States. The rules aren’t actually new but they were recently made more prominent, posted in mosques and public places. The imam’s sermon cannot be longer than 30 minutes. Prayer in public areas outside the mosques is forbidden. In Khotan, one of the province’s main cities, the residents are not allowed to worship at mosques outside of town. The passports of Uighurs, who are mainly Muslim, are being confiscated, to better control their going to Mecca for The Hadj, the pilgrimage which is one of Islam’s five pillars, and also it is said to keep local Muslims from having contact with other Muslims. There were many other rules such as keeping students from leaving the university during Ramadan to prevent them from fasting and joining their families for the evening meal.
The debate between the separation of church and state in the United States can sometimes take so many turns, it’s helpful sometimes to reconnect to what religious interference really is.

Both sides in the Middle East are engaged in a dead-end cycle of anger which is more and more likely to lead to the destruction of one by the other–This morning’s NYT’s had a long article about camps in Lebanon teaching youths about Islam, about having a clean heart and also about Israel being their enemy and Jews being deceitful and liars–presumably hating Israel with a clean heart. Another part of the paper also had an article about Israel’s refusal to allow food, fuel and medical supplies to be delivered to Gaza. For the last 2 1/2 weeks since the cease fire with Hamas ended Israel has sealed the border not allowing UN humanitarian aid thus ensuring the collective punishment of civilians, an act against international law.
It’s no longer who’s right and who’s wrong in this war, it’s who can commit the most hostile act, who can punish the most, engage in the most extensive retaliation. Many months ago columnist Tom Friedman wrote that at some point people in the Middle East would have to decide that they loved their children more than they hated each other. This kind of tit-for-tat that leads to a dead end and ensures the hatred of future generations makes one ask, isn’t now the time to love one’s children more?
It is no longer news that the solution has a pre-requisite, one that may no longer see, as naive as it once did–Stop the violence. While the more people understand this, the faster it will stop, people also need to grasp that the more one waits, the most likely is the alternative–The destruction of one side by the other.