Danielle Levy

What would appointing Caroline Kennedy as U.S. Senator do to our practice of equality?–I have no questions about Caroline Kennedy’s fitness to be a senator. For one thing I’ve read two of her books. She is thoughtful, intelligent, articulate with a grasp of many of the issues that matter to making us into a better society. She’s grown up amid politics and knows what it’s all about. She’s sophisticated, knowledgeable and savvy. But her political accomplishments, mainly raising money and supporting Barak Obama, were successful in large part because of her Kennedy pedigree. There’s nothing wrong with the name and with those who bore it before her, nothing wrong with their service and sacrifices for their country. Here’s the rub, it’s their service not hers, their sacrifices, not hers. We live in a modern society, whatever modern means in the academic literature, it is used to make us stand apart from those societies where status was derived from ascription, where one’s social class determined one’s place in the world, societies where equality was not for everyone. Without the Kennedy name Caroline Kennedy would be in a different social and political position. Without the Kennedy name her even thinking about being appointed as senator would be at best remote. However politically expedient it may end up being for Governor Paterson, or for those who support her nomination, from a larger philosophical point of view it does look it would weaken the principles of equal access and social mobility.

The financial crisis is bound to lead us to confront the bubble our society has created–For the last few weeks as bailouts and rescue packages have become the order of the day, we’ve been talking about huge numbers,numbers which most of us do not comprehend. How many of us really understand what a trillion dollar means? I just read a staggering number. In a recent article the Los Angeles Times details the breakdown of the money the United States government has committed to rescue Wall Street and the financial system, although not all of it has thus far been tapped. The number: $8.5 trillion. This $8.5 trillion includes such things as $700 billion for the Troubled Asset Relief Program or $1.8 trillion for the Commercial Paper Program which buys short-term notes from companies which use the proceeds to pay bills. I must admit I am not clear whether these are their bills or not. In fact as I read the list, I confess I do not understand it all. Like many, I have numerous questions. My questions, though, primarily revolve around the value of money, where it comes from, leads to and means. Assuming the decision makers know what they are doing–another set of questions altogether–the many trillions we are now spending–since it looks sure there shall be more in future than the $8.5 trillion of the article–will at some point have to be accounted for. Is that when we shall come face to face with the limitations of our using money, with our over reliance on its material value? Is that when the bubble we have created about its role in our society will burst?

The UN Declaration of Human Rights is 60 years-old, no wonder we’re still have a long way to go–It’s fashionable for many to cite the absence of a more universally applied practice of human rights as an example of how troubled the world is. While there is truth in that statement, when seen in historical perspective, one comes to another conclusion. The Declaration of Human Rights guaranteeing freedom such as freedom of religion dates to December 10th 1949 and was spearheaded by former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt. Human history is thousands of years old, and yet coming together to agree on human rights, what some of these rights are is only 60 years old! That may seem long to someone in their teens, or even twenties, but not to the rest of us. More important in terms of recorded history human rights is still in its infancy. Yes, as we practice its principles, we’re going to experience growing pains, we’re going to make mistakes, we’re going to be imperfect. The point is not how ideal is our practice, but whether it is making headway in the world, in our respective countries, in terms of its being generally accepted. Fact is it is. For one thing it is now an accepted principle, even when we disagree on what rights it actually entails. And that is a human accomplishment! We are not turning back, and though progress comes too slowly for those who are suffering from its lack, be it Tibet or Myanmar, Darfur or North Korea along with so many other places, the cause of human rights is alive and well.