Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.Robert Louis Stevenson

January 2015

  • Transcending Its Controversy

    Periodically there’s a movie about an historical event or person and we argue about its accuracy. History itself is full of interpretations and historians themselves argue about which is truer. Maybe, though, when it comes to movies, the issue of historical accuracy is not the best criterion. Artistic freedom is another issue, one’s that’s usually cited in defense of whatever a point of view may be, as it is now with the movie Selma. It’s a powerful argument, one difficult to argue against. But does artistic freedom exist in a vacuum? Does it mean anything goes? Fresh from the Charlie Hebdo attack and murders it is a question some are asking. In that case Charlie Hebdo may not be a good example, because as a newspaper its mission in essence is to provoke everyone and bait anything. Exceptions aside, artistic freedom doesn’t erase the issue of social responsibility. And even when artists factor it in, it does not ensure there shall be no dissent, no criticism. John Adams, the composer of the opera “The Death of Klinghoffer” wanted to be responsible and portray both sides of an issue. Still the protest was strong enough the Metropolitan Opera had to cancel its scheduled HD broadcast of it a few months ago. Movies are such a powerful medium, the responsibility of the filmmakers ought to be even greater. Sometimes facts are altered to create drama, often a sign of a filmmaker’s limitations. But there’s a difference between bending facts and interpreting them. Filmmakers are people, as imperfect as the rest of us, and most of all entitled to their point of view. What I expect from a filmmaker is honesty and taking responsibility for his or her point of view. What I expect from a movie making a social statement is that its impact outweighs whatever flaws it might have.

    With Selma, therefore, the issue ought not to be whether LBJ is portrayed accurately, but whether the director is open about her point of view and whether the movie’s message and importance are bigger than its controversy—or its flaws.

  • The Power of The Pen

    In the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attack and the ensuing demonstrations, it is even more important to note instances of the power of the pen. In December 2014 the Los Angeles Times ran a four parts series “Products of Mexico” where it documented the conditions of megafarms in that country. Those large enterprises and corporations are the source of much of the fruits and vegetables consumed in the United States. As one can deduce as the reason behind the series, they are places of abuse, with dangerous and squalid housing, with children as young as 6 working in the fields, with workers being denied wages, with company owned stores charging high prices and placing the workers in a perpetual indebtedness. The report was accompanied by striking pictures making the message vivid and poignant. Since its publication two groups have launched a joint social responsibility initiative to help abate or resolve the conditions: The Confederation of Agribusiness Associations in the Mexican state of Sinaloa and the Fresh Produce Association of the Americas in Arizona. In addition the series has prodded several activists and organizations to renew their interest and pursue solutions, thus giving the problem enough visibility to create an impetus .

    The power of the pen shouldn’t be overrated, but neither should it be underestimated.

  • Robots And The Future of Work

    Sometimes big changes happen imperceptibly, away from the headlines. They happen drop by drop until the proverbial one that makes the bucket overflow. That’s what happening with robots. They’re gaining ground as the society and the labor force in (more…)

Subscribe and Be Notified of New Posts

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

We will never sell or share your information, we promise.